PTC Top 10 | PTC Next 10 | Cost Savings Program | 60-Sec PTC Test | Seminar | Home | Contact Us

this copyrighted article appeared in Issue 14 of the journal Phase-Transfer Catalysis Communications
and is reprinted with permission from PTC Communications, Inc.

Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages |
| PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary

Replace Methoxide (Methylate) and Other Strong Bases with Hydroxide!
Big Cost Savings Opportunities, Myths, Questions and Answers

Marc Halpern, PTC Organics, Inc.
900 Briggs Road, Suite 145, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 USA
tel: +1 856-222-1146; fax: +1 856-222-1124; E-mail: halpern@ptcorganics.com

Abstract: Significant benefits and cost savings may be achieved by using Phase Transfer Catalysis with inexpensive inorganic base in place of expensive and hazardous sodium methoxide, sodium amide, sodium hydride or t-butoxide. It is often surprising and possible that inexpensive inorganic bases, such as sodium hydroxide (and/or others), under carefully chosen phase transfer catalysis conditions, can 

[1] provide sufficient basicity
[2] with minimal hydrolysis 
[3] at low cost 
[4] while avoiding handling of the flammable solid NaOCH3 dust or volatile methanol solution.

The advantages are compelling!

To Bottom

Replace Methoxide (Methylate) and Other Strong Bases with Hydroxide!
Big Cost Savings Opportunities, Myths, Questions and Answers

Marc Halpern, PTC Organics, Inc.
900 Briggs Road, Suite 145, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 USA
tel: +1 856-222-1146; fax: +1 856-222-1124; E-mail: halpern@ptcorganics.com

"Replace methoxide with hydroxide in OUR process...YOU CAN’T DO THAT!" This is one of the most common statements heard when suggesting to use PTC with NaOH instead of sodium methoxide. We all learned in our first organic chemistry course that inorganic bases, such as NaOH, especially in the presence of water, will hydrolyze water-sensitive compounds. As discussed below, this is not necessarily true. In addition, chemists will naturally choose a strong, "dry" base to perform reactions which require deprotonation of a weakly acidic compound which may also be water-sensitive. Expensive dry strong bases commonly chosen include sodium methoxide (methylate), potassium t-butoxide, sodium amide, sodium hydride, sodium metal, LDA or others. If the reactant or product is very sensitive to nucleophiles (reactants such as phosgene, acyl chlorides, sulfonyl chlorides, phosphoryl chlorides, anhydrides, epoxides), then bases such as NaH or sodium metal are often chosen. In many cases involving water-sensitive or nucleophile-sensitive reactants and/or products, choosing sodium hydroxide or other inexpensive inorganic bases as the base may mistakenly be considered foolish for reasons of reactivity, hydrolysis and possibly other factors. Following are some myths and truths about strong base PTC reactions.

Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages | PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary

Low Cost and High Performance Using PTC with Inexpensive Base


System Capability

Strong Base
(e.g., sodium methoxide,
NaNH2, NaH, t-butoxide)

Phase Transfer Catalysis &
Inexpensive Inorganic Base

(e.g., sodium hydroxide)

Low cost

 

√√√ YES √√√

Base strength – pKa up to 24

can deprotonate organic substrates and perform C-alkylation, N-alkylation, O-alkylation on compounds with pKa up to 24 (including activated methylene compounds; ketones, aldehydes, nitriles, esters, sulfones, imines)

YES

YES

Base strength – pKa up to 38

can perform selected base promoted reactions with substrates up to pKa 38 (e.g., oxidation with oxygen, dehydrohalogenation, deuteration)

YES

YES

Avoid hydrolysis/work with water-sensitive compounds

ability to design system to eliminate or minimize hydrolysis (e.g., work with esters, anhydrides)

YES

YES

Can work with nucleophile-sensitive compounds

(e.g., phosgene, PCl3, benzoyl Cl, sulfonyl Cl’s)

no, for methoxide/NaNH2

YES

Do not have to keep dry

 

YES

Not flammable or explosive

 

YES

Minimize emissions (VOC, NH3, H2)

YES

Despite healthy skepticism and intuition that it may not prudent to mix NaOH with water sensitive compounds...is it possible anyway?!?

Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages | PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary
 

Hydrolysis

Myth Sodium hydroxide hydrolyzes esters and other water-sensitive compounds under most phase transfer catalysis conditions.

Truth Careful selection of PTC conditions, including solvent, ionic strength, catalyst, agitation, physical form of the base and other process parameters allows the use of sodium hydroxide in the reaction of esters and other water sensitive compounds while avoiding/minimizing hydrolysis.

You can perform reactions of esters using PTC and base without hydrolysis. If you choose, you can use PTC to purposely perform hydrolysis of esters. It all depends on the reaction conditions chosen. It is more obvious to use PTC to hydrolyze esters very effectively. For example, Dehmlow reported that diethyl adipate can be hydrolyzed effectively with PTC and 50% NaOH in 1 hour at room temperature (J. Chem. Res. S, 1979, 238). However, it is also possible to suppress hydrolysis of water-sensitive compounds under PTC conditions, primarily in systems in which hydroxide (or other base) has a choice between acting as a base or as a nucleophile. The PTC system can be designed so that the hydroxide (or other base) acts predominantly as a base. The fundamental concept is to use the phase boundary to "protect" the ester (or much more water-sensitive compounds, such as phosgene) from the base and water, to minimize non-catalyzed interfacial hydrolysis and regulate the desired reaction using the phase transfer catalyst. An elegant and somehwat counter-intuitive example of using PTC with 50% NaOH while reducing phosgene excess from 30 mole% to 2 mole% is found in US patent 5,391,682. Another surprising success is the PTC reaction of benzoyl chloride with phenol in the presence of basic water with minimal hydrolysis of the benzoyl chloride (Water Environ. Res., 1998, 70, 4). Another example of using PTC with a water-sensitive compound in the presence of water is an etherification using ethyl chloroacetate (reacted at the Cl atom) with high yield and minimal hydrolysis (US 3,969,360).

Often, the design of such systems is not easy and usually requires significant expertise (extensive trial-and-error experimentation may not be effective) to carefully choose the right combination of solvent, ionic strength, catalyst, agitation, physical form of the base and other process parameters. It should be noted that other inexpensive inorganic bases can be used besides sodium hydroxide. PTC Organics specializes in developing very challenging PTC processes using water-sensitive reactants and products using inexpensive inorganic bases in place of the classical expensive "dry" strong bases.


Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages | PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary

Base Strength

Myth Sodium hydroxide is not a strong enough base to perform many of the useful organic base promoted reactions which can be performed using sodium methoxide, t-butoxide, sodium hydride, sodium amide and other strong bases.

Truth NaOH has been used under PTC conditions to perform deprotonations of substrates with pKa up to 38 (thiophene α-proton), oxidation of methylene groups up to pKa 33 (e.g., diphenylmethane to benzophenone) and alkylations of substrates up to pKa 24.

When hydroxide is transferred to a non-polar environment by a phase transfer catalyst, enormous enhancement of basicity can be achieved, which may approach gas phase basicity. Enhanced basicity can be achieved with other inexpensive inorganic bases. For example, PTC can be used with inexpensive inorganic bases to perform alkylation of many heterocycles, ketones, aldehydes, nitriles, sulfones, esters, imines and other activated methylene groups. One of the more impressive publications is the replacement of LDA in dry THF with PTC and aqueous NaOH to perform a Michael addition of an iminoester to an α,β-unsaturated ester, with a simultaneous 19% yield improvement (to 85%) and minimal hydrolysis of any of the esters (J. Fluorine Chem., 1996, 80, 27).

Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages | PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary
   

Cost Savings

Question How much money can be saved by replacing strong bases, such as sodium methoxide, sodium amide, sodium hydride and potassium t-butoxide with a phase transfer catalyst and an inexpensive inorganic base?

Answer The answer depends on the identities, amounts and current prices of catalyst and base, but following may be used as guidelines:

  • Replace sodium methoxide (methylate)
    save up to $1,250 per ton
  • Replace sodium amide
    save up to $2,500 per ton
  • Replace sodium hydride
    save up to $6,000 per ton
  • Replace potassium t-butoxide
    save up to $18,000 per ton

          

Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages | PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary

Other Process Advantages

Question What other process advantages may be achieved by using phase transfer catalysis with inorganic base in place of expensive dry strong base?

Answer

  • Avoid Special Handling
    Strong bases such as sodium methoxide, sodium hydride and sodium amide are very moisture sensitive and must be kept dry. These bases are often sold as a fine powder and the dust may represent a respiratory hazard. The inorganic bases typically used with PTC (e.g., NaOH, others), may be easily handled as a liquid (aqueous solution), in bead or granular form.
  • Flammability & Explosivity
    Strong bases such as sodium methoxide, potassium t-butoxide and sodium amide are considered flammable. Sodium hydride can generate hydrogen gas and can be explosive. The inorganic bases typically used with PTC, such as NaOH, are neither flammable nor explosive.
  • Emissions
    Sodium methoxide is sometimes purchased as a solution in methanol which is a volatile organic solvent, requiring emission controls. The inorganic bases typically used with PTC are supplied as solid or aqueous solutions with no VOC potential.

    Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages | PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary
        

The PTC vs Methoxide Decision

Question Why isn’t PTC used much more to replace expensive strong dry base with inexpensive inorganic base?

Answer There are two overcomable "reasons":

  1. Perception
  2. Let’s face it...it still may be hard to believe that you can avoid hydrolysis of esters or phosgene in the presence of concentrated aqueous NaOH! Therefore, many chemists may simply not seriously consider using NaOH as a base when working with water-sensitive compounds. This is understandable. On the other hand, try to recall some of the times you have used methanolic KOH or the fact that the isocyanate MDI (used in polyurethanes) can be used in aqueous systems. Not all water-sensitive compounds are as sensitive as we may perceive as long as they are protected by an appropriate interface.

  3. Expertise

In defense of the skeptics, it should be noted that quite often, the challenge is not trivial to choose the proper PTC process conditions to perform the desired base-promoted reaction with an inexpensive inorganic base while minimizing hydrolysis. Given the high workload of many chemists, it is usually difficult to screen and optimize the myriad of process parameters required to develop and fully commercialize a PTC-base process within tight deadlines. PTC Organics is the only company dedicated exclusively to developing high performance PTC processes and PTC Organics has the expertise to develop PTC-base reactions in a timely manner with a high likelihood of commercial success.  

Strong Base Savings Estimates | Guideline Table| Base Strength Myth | Hydrolysis Myth | Process Advantages | PTC vs Methoxide Decision | Summary

Summary

PRO

The benefits are very compelling for replacing sodium methoxide and other expensive strong bases with phase transfer catalysis and inexpensive inorganic bases. The benefits include significant cost savings, easier handling, lower emissions and enhanced safety.

CON

One must overcome chemical intuition and natural resistance to considering using NaOH and other inexpensive inorganic bases in the presence of water-sensitive compounds. Significant expertise is often needed to successfully develop PTC-base reactions with high performance and in a timely manner.

ARE YOU WILLING TO CONSIDER?

Are you open to considering the possibility of using PTC with inexpensive inorganic base instead of classical expensive strong base? It’s your choice.


Call PTC Organics
+1 856-222-1146

to learn how your company can improve process performance.


PTC Cost Savings Program  |  PTC Top 10  |  PTC Reactions  |  PTC Benefits  |  60-Sec PTC Test  |  30 Sec PTC Test  |

On-site Seminar  | Home | Contact

PTC Organics, Inc.
900 Briggs Road, Suite 145
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 USA
Tel. +1 (856) 222-1146 - save@ptcorganics.com
please address web site comments or corrections to webmaster@ptcorganics.com

Last Modified 24-Jul-2001           
© 2001 PTC Organics, Inc.